The American Response - 1361 Words

America’s two most recent wars are the Iraq War and the War on Terror. Both of these wars have accomplished their goals, but come at a great cost. There were quite a few factors in both of these wars that affected international security. First, I will analyze both of the wars and then intertwine them together to show the overall effect they have created on America. Let us look first at the War on Terror. The War on Terror started after the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda attacked America on September 11th 2001. America responded with a military offensive against terrorist groups in Afghanistan. The primary targets in Afghanistan were Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Many scholars agree with what America did in this situation. In Robert J Art’s†¦show more content†¦The question of whether the use of force served the long-term interest of the United States in the War on Terror is a debatable question. There is no denying that the United States has significantly affected Al-Qaeda and its acts of terrorism. Victory in the War on Terror however, will not end similar to how World War Two ended on the deck of the USS Missouri. From a military standpoint the United States is winning the War on Terror, but from a financial standpoint the United States is losing. Long down the road the American taxpayer will be paying for the substantial cost of the War on Terror. The Iraq war began because of Iraq’s supposed breaking of United Nations Security Resolution 1441. It was believed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. UN Security Resolution 1441 was Iraq’s final chance to comply with their weapons of mass destruction disarmament obligations. Iraq did not comply. The United States and Great Britain believed that Iraq was a serious threat to international security. An Iraq with weapons of mass destruction posed a threat to Great Britain, the United States well-being and to allies around the globe. Let us not forget that Saddam Hussein, the l eader of Iraq during the Iraq War had a history of affecting international security. Saddam Hussein started the Iraq-Iran War and invaded Kuwait. Saddam also played a major part in systematic genocide of his own people and some were subjected to chemical attacks. It isShow MoreRelatedThe American Plague Summary/Response1125 Words   |  5 PagesThe American Plague The American Plague was written by Molly C. Crosby, who is as much as a researcher as she is an author. In 1648, a slave ship returning from Africa carried a few mosquitoes infected with a deadly virus know as yellow fever. The ship landed in the New World and thrived in the hot wet climate and on the white settlers. The New World has never come in contact with yellow fever and as a result no immunities have been built up. The virus obtained its name from the way it turns theRead MoreResponse to The American Scholar Essay example721 Words   |  3 PagesJulia Mitri English 31 Novick 18 September 2011 Ralph Waldo Emerson’s â€Å"The American Scholar† Post- Reading Response In Ralph Waldo Emerson’s 1837 address to the Phi Beta Kappa Society at Harvard, called â€Å"The American Scholar†, he makes clear his thoughts and ideas on the European cultural and cerebral influence on America. Emerson wanted to get across that American scholars needed to create their own independent American literature and academic world, separate from European history. Emerson usesRead MoreReader Response Journal : Reader Response Chapters Of American Dreams1499 Words   |  6 PagesReader Response Journal #1 Chapters 1-3, pages 1-24 â€Å"But we reservation Indians dont get to realize our dreams. We dont get these chances. Or choices. Were just poor. Thats all we are.† (Pg.13) I think that thE author is trying to show that by growing up on the Spokane Indian Reservation, Junior has developed an idea in his head that he cant be anything other than poor. He realizes that his parents had dreams to be something â€Å"other than poor† but there was never anyone to pay attention toRead MoreResponse Paper to Betrayal of the American Dream1085 Words   |  5 PagesI’ve always been an optimistic person, but while reading The Betrayal of the American Dream, I felt so much of that optimism drain out of me. Prior to this, I had mistakenly believed there was a difference between the two political parties in that one of them actually had the people’s best interests at heart. I began to question that belief in recent years, and Barlett and Steele killed whatever faith I had remaining in it. The more I read the book, the more I wanted to find something that wasn’tRead MoreCrisis Response Time for American Red Cross Essay1254 Words   |  6 Pages (1) Since the writing of this case, the American Red Cross (ARC) is on record as having conceptually addressed its infrastructure and operational hurdles. However, very few strides have been made to reverse stakeholder perception crisis response time, relief dispatch strategies, and the ethical dilemmas plaguing the organization. Governmental mandates that streamlined the board and that established accounting /reporting parameters have done little to modify the organizations operational cultureRead More Response to The Damned and the Beautiful: American Youth in the 1920s 1408 Words   |  6 PagesPaula Fass’s The Damned and the Beautiful: American Youth in the 1920s delves into the social and cultural climate of the 1920’s middle-class youth in America. Fass observes the multidimensional dynamics of the post-World War I society as citizens adjust to pertinent matters such as industrialization, prohibition and immigration. Amidst the ongoing social, political and economic al issues of the early twentieth century, youth played an active role in contemporary life. Adolescents responded to issuesRead MoreResponse to Turners Essay on The Significance of the Frontier in American History501 Words   |  3 PagesResponse to Turners Essay on The Significance of the Frontier in American History Turners The Significance of the Frontier in American History essay presents the primary model for comprehending American history. Turner developed his notions on the uncovering of the 1890 census that the frontier was coming to an end, that the nation had occupied its continental borders. As Turner discusses in his essay, an extensive era of American development approached an ending, butRead MoreNlrb On Behalf Of Mrs. Dawn Vs. American Medical Response Of Connecticut Company Essay881 Words   |  4 PagesCase Title : NLRB on behalf of Mrs. Dawn vs. American Medical Response of Connecticut Company Case number: 34-CA-012576 Date Opened: 01/19/2010 Status: closed Presentation of the Case The case filed by NLRB was between the American Medical Response of Connecticut in New Haven and one of their employees called Mrs. Dawn. Upon verbal disagreement with her supervisor, Mrs. Dawn posted a negative remark on her private facebook wall about the supervisor. The remark attracted comments from herRead MoreNlrb On Behalf Of Mrs. Dawnmarie Vs. American Medical Response Of Connecticut Company Essay881 Words   |  4 PagesCase Title : NLRB on behalf of Mrs. Dawnmarie vs. American Medical Response of Connecticut Company Case number: 34-CA-012576 Date Opened: 01/19/2010 Status: closed Presentation of the Case The case filed by NLRB was between the American Medical Response of Connecticut in New Haven and one of their employees called Mrs. Dawnmarie. Upon verbal disagreement with her supervisor, Mrs. Dawnmarie posted a negative remark on her private facebook wall about the supervisor. The remark attracted commentsRead MoreHow and Why Did American Popular Culture Influence Australian Society in the 1950s and 1960s? To What Extent Did Australia Develop its Own Response to these Influences?1595 Words   |  7 Pagesand 1960s were times of unprecedented change, and Australian society was influenced greatly by American popular culture, through various mediums, such as: music, film, television and fashion. This especially affected teenagers. It will be explained how Australian society was impacted by American popular culture, and also why American popular culture had such an affect. Australian developed its own responses to these influences, and the extent of this will also be explored. The 1950s meant the emergence

Analysis Of The Book The Scarlet Letter - 1141 Words

Blake Allison P#1 AP NOVEL FORM 1. Title: The Scarlet Letter 2. Author and date of first publication: Nathaniel Hawthorne, 1850 3. List four main characters with a one-sentence description of each. a. Hester Prynne- Hester Prynne, the protagonist and wearer of the scarlet letter, is a very independent, loving, intelligent, and at times depressed woman who is the mother of Pearl. b. Arthur Dimmesdale- Arthur Dimmesdale, the father of Pearl, is a reverend in town who is greatly honored for being a strong church leader; however, he does not confess of his sin. c. Roger Chillingworth- Roger Chillingworth, Hester’s husband, is a well-travelled, intelligent physician who is determined on getting revenge. d. Pearl Prynne- Pearl†¦show more content†¦b. Hester’s Home- Hester and Pearl live in a small cottage with a thatched roof on the outskirts of town near the waterfront. c. Forest- The forest is symbolized as the Devil’s playground; however, it is filled with huge pine trees, a brook, many creatures, and sparing sunshine that is very warming. d. The overall setting of the novel is Boston, Massachusetts in 1640-1647 6. One paragraph plot summary focusing on main events. The novel begins with Hester Prynne beginning her punishment for her adultery by wearing her scarlet letter on her bosom and standing up on the town scaffold for three hours while holding her baby, Pearl. People wish her punishment was worse and some try to get her to tell of her accompanying sinner. She sees a strange man in the distance and she later learns it’s her husband who is out to seek revenge. We continue through the story where we learn more about Hester and Pearl. Hester works as a seamstress for the rich. She takes care of Pearl who is a constant remembrance of her sin along with her letter. The readers then learn that the people want to take Pearl away from Hester but this ends up not happening after some persuasive arguing from Dimmesdale. Hester is continually kept as an outsider from the town and is viewed as a sinner. We begin to learn more about Dimmesdale and his sickness. Roger works as his physician. Dimmesdale is not really sick rather full of guilt and anguish. The reader begins

Hobbes Vs Rousseau free essay sample

?Thomas Hobbes’ imagined â€Å"state of nature† is full of â€Å"masterless men† (p. 140). Jean Jacque Rousseau’s imagined â€Å"state of nature† is full of radically independent, solitary individuals who are innocent of good and evil. How does Hobbes come to that conclusion about man in the state of nature? On what kinds of evidence does he rely? How does Rousseau come to his conclusion about individuals in the state of nature. On what kind of arguments does he rely? Compare and contrast their imagined states of nature making sure you reference the evidence they draw upon to build their argument. It is important to remember when relating Hobbes and Rousseau and their ideas of the natural state that they are not speaking of the same thing. Hobbes defines the state of nature as the time when men lived without a common power. Men would constantly be at war with each other, and the elements around them. We will write a custom essay sample on Hobbes Vs Rousseau or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page There would be no laws or authority and without them, men would believe that everything is theirs. It is very similar to the mindset of a child. Children are not born with a natural inclination to share. That is something that parents must teach them as they grow. Greed is naturally instilled in men and because of this men have been fighting and violent even before societies were developed. Men were fighting, stealing, and murdering each other for survival. Rousseau argues with Hobbes. Rousseau describes a hypothetical time when society did not exist and men only acted on their natural instincts which were peaceful and timid. Men would not have any sense of right and wrong because they had not been molded by society’s standards yet. Hobbes states that in the state of nature men would be fearful and greedy and because of this it was necessary for societies to exist. Humans need protection from each other because instinctually we are violent and pose a threat to others. Men naturally crave property and self-preservation and in this environment peace is not possible. When men come together to form societies social contracts are necessary to guarantee the protection of rights of each man. Once a social contract is established man gave his rights over to the sovereign. A social contract is an understanding in which multiple individuals come together and give their rights to one man. Once the individuals give their rights over them become one sovereign. The rights and protection of a single individual is no longer important; only the protection of the sovereign as a whole. This is when men could begin to live their lives without fear. Once order was imparted on the people or a society they would live in harmony with each or be forced to leave. If this occurs that individual would no longer be under the protection of the sovereign. Hobbes believes that there are three principles that cause violence: competition, glory, and difference. If one man sees another with an item that he craves competition will take over and he will take the item using force or other means. Glory drives a man to be superior. Without a firm authority established one will be driven to be the most powerful. Rousseau disagrees with Hobbes and insists that in the state of nature the only factor is survival. In this case I believe that Hobbes is thinking too much from a society stand point and he is also contradicting himself. Society molds us into competing for glory. In the state of nature this would not be the case. Hobbes and Rousseau both agree that in the state of nature reason and inequality do not exist yet and it would not be possible for man to understand that he should be more powerful than another. If inequality does not exist then it would not be possible for one man to be more powerful then another. In Rousseau’s natural state men are solitary, timid, and greed doesn’t exist because society has not corrupted their innocence yet. Rousseau believes that human nature is inherently good and it wasn’t until societies began to establish that human’s instincts became corrupted. When man is in its natural state they are solitary and have no sense of ownership over anything. They struggle with their environment and their natural conditions. Individuals are looking out for themselves and self-preservation is guiding them, just as in Hobbes natural state, however Rousseau says there is no violence between them. Rousseau compares man to animals by saying man needs to satisfy their physical needs for survival, however we have a natural repugnance for seeing others in pain. Because of this we would never harm another person for our own selfish desires. Language does not exist yet because people are solitary and keep to themselves. Because of this reason does not exist. Without reason there is no jealously, inequality, or other negative emotions that lead to violence. This seems too optimistic to be accurate. Compassion would exist to an extent but self-preservation will always be more of a priority. If a man has to cause pain to another because there are limited resources then so be it. For example, let’s say it was winter and a man found a small cave. There was already someone else in there and it was only big enough to fit one. Rousseau believes that since men have no sense of ownership, and are solitary creatures that one would simply leave because they don’t have to reasoning to think, â€Å"I was here first, so it is mine. † Hobbes would say that men are violent and greedy and in this situation violence would occur. Men are born with a natural instinct to survive and because of this both men would fight over shelter. Humans would not do harm just to be â€Å"evil† because good and evil would not exist yet. Once families started to form humans had more time to do other activities and with this came reason and inequality. Rousseau gives the example of a dance around a fire. One man will look at another and see that this man is bigger than another and reason would lead him to believe that one must be better than the other. Once inequality is established man has a need to be more powerful then another. Another factor that leads to inequality is the ownership of land. Rousseau states, â€Å"The first man who, having fenced in a piece of land, said This is mine, and found people naive enough to believe him, that man was the true founder of civil society. From how many crimes, wars, and murders, from how many horrors and misfortunes might not any one have saved mankind, by pulling up the stakes, or filling up the ditch, and crying to his fellows: Beware of listening to this impostor; you are undone if you once forget that the fruits of the earth belong to us all, and the earth itself to nobody. † Once man owns land and inequality has set in men will become greedy and want more believing that owning land is a symbol of power. Man will begin to want more wealth and glory and this is when violence starts. The natural instincts of being solitary and peaceful have been corrupted by the society and humans have now been molded into greedy power hungry people. Rousseau states, â€Å"I must make everyone see that bonds of servitude are formed from the mutual dependence of men. It is impossible to slave a man without first putting him in the positions of being unable to do without another person. Rousseau believes that when men live alone they cannot be corrupted because they rely on no one but themselves for survival. Once men come together and form families and societies they become enslaved by dependence into that society. After looking at both ideas I believe that Hobbes is not most accurate in his thinking. Rousseau has an optimistic, humanist way of looking at men, but I believe that it doesn’t matter how far back in history one goes, men were always violent, greedy, fearful creatures. Just because reason didn’t exist does not mean that men wouldn’t have a wanting for resources that weren’t theirs. Men may not have been able to reason why they wanted something, but the greed was still there. Society and social contracts did not cause or mold our greediness, and violence like Rousseau believes. Those instincts were instilled in men from the beginning as a way of survival. It is impossible to have any absolute truth over who is right in this argument. Once man has been civilized the effects cannot be reversed. We would never be able to go back to the state of nature and this is why the debate is still continuing today. Nature vs. nurture is a topic that is debated today because it is impossible to know for sure what is instinct and what has been molded by our society.

Tokugawa and Manchu Essay Example

Tokugawa and Manchu Essay Manchu that had derived from China and Tokugawa that had derived from Japan are two tribes that had fought for their rights and the beliefs they had believed in. Both were ruling powers that lasted for a certain amount of time that had equally shaped the way both countries are now. Although one being from China and the other from Japan, through our studies in class we come to see that not only are they different but they come to be similar as well in some aspects. Both honoring a traditional lifestyle of loyalty , duty and respect, both had long lasting effects on their nations. Manchu people came from Manchuria, a place north of the Great Wall of China that had believed highly of the Beijing emperor. However, they had always neglected his over leadership in many ways and once rebellion occurred Manchu people saw their chance in advocating against the emperor and soon won the support of many of the conservative Chinese and mandarin class on their side. Therefore, Manchu was the last dynasty to occur and become the most successful as well. They ruled from 1644 to 1912 at the end of the Ming Dynasty that lead to the development of both the Qing Dynasty and Jin Dynasty that had formed what is China today. The Manchu people had talented skilled of hunting and were mainly involved in hunting and some were skilled in horsemanship and archery. The imposed a traditional lifestyle that liked the ideas of order and respect for authority and made sure to ensure justice in the villages. Two great leaders of the Qing Dynasty were Kangxi and his grandson Qienlong that ha d developed long lasting policies. However, it was also noted that as generations passed on people started straying away from the Manchu lifestyle and cultivated their own regardless that they were all brought up the Manchu way. Both emperors made it clear that they would try their hardest to separate the Manchu tribesmen from the other ethnic Chinese people yet the Manchu language We will write a custom essay sample on Tokugawa and Manchu specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Tokugawa and Manchu specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Tokugawa and Manchu specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer