Business Leadership :: essays research papers

Parallel to the evolution that has occured in the business world in decades past, is the evolution of views on participative leadership among managers. Participative leadership refers to the manner in which employers micturate come to treat their employees. This treatment has evolved from days of traditional, autocratic transactionhips in which employees were told on the nose what tasks to do, without regard to their feelings or what intelligent input could be made to straightaways spectrum of treatment defined by two terms, human relations and human resources. Managers approaches today, now consider, not only the employees feelings, but the potential added benefits they business leader be able to bring to the household. The difference between human relations and human resources lies in the goals and expectations of the manager. With human relations, the managers primary maintenance is reducing employee resistance to authority with the satisfaction of the employees basic or chestrate to feel accomplishment and belonging in the company secondary is the proceeding and added benefits the employee may be able to contribute once team spirit is increased. On the other hand, managers who practices human resources look to empower their employees by encouraging them to take initiative and reach goals by their own capabilities and resources. With the sense of self-accomplishment gained by doing this, it is therefore that employee morale will be raised. Not only will the employees presence truly matter, but the companys productivity and achievement will also be greater. Managers stances today are headed in the focusing of the human resources model, a beneficial move for the welfare of company relations and success, but there are those who still practice human relations. umteen companies demonstrate both models, proving employer/employee relationships in todays companies continue to float the spectrum. Two guiding companies of the human resource model are luminous Technologies and Miller Brewing Company. The employees of these firms have been empowered with the ability to work in teams and achieve goals on their own. This flexibility has resulted in creativity and productivity unobserved before. The effect greater employee morale, respect, and overall company success. With the human relations model, such(prenominal) success is uncomparable. Understandably, there are those who still advocate it though. Those people exponent look at such successful companies as Mary Kay Cosmetics. The consultants of this firm enjoy the encouragement and widespread support, making job loyalty and morale very high. However, in reality, employees of Mary Kay dont have the probability or flexibility to explore their ideas in terms of corporate and important decisions.